State of Doubt

In May of 2023, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton was impeached by the Texas House of Representatives. However, the seeds were sown long before.

The impeachment marked one of the most consequential political confrontations in modern Texas history.

But its significance did not end with the Senate trial or the final vote of acquittal.

It continues to have national consequences and shape political debate, campaign messaging, and public perception in Texas today.

A Story Still Being Fought Over

The events surrounding the impeachment have not settled into consensus.

Instead, they remain actively contested—interpreted differently by political actors, institutions, and the public.

Those interpretations now extend beyond historical discussion and into current political campaigns, where the meaning of the impeachment and the conduct behind it remain central points of debate. State of Doubt examines the record underlying those competing narratives.

The Context Behind the Impeachment

The impeachment did not arise from a single moment or event. It developed over time through overlapping legal proceedings, internal disputes, and public allegations that shaped how events unfolded and were later understood.

• Long-running legal proceedings and public allegations involving Ken Paxton
• A 2015 securities fraud indictment which was later dropped and resolved without any admission of any guilt or any conviction
• Internal disputes and whistleblower allegations within the Attorney General's office
• Growing legislative scrutiny and institutional conflict

What This Series Is

State of Doubt is a documentary series that reconstructs major political events through primary sources, public records, and firsthand accounts. Season One focuses on the full arc of events surrounding the impeachment of Ken Paxton, including:

• The background conditions that preceded it
• The escalation of internal and legislative conflict
• The impeachment proceedings in the Texas House
• The Senate trial and its outcome
• The aftermath and continuing disputes over meaning and interpretation

Competing Interpretations

The same set of events has generated sharply different conclusions.

To some, they reflect serious concerns about conduct, governance, and accountability in public office. To others, they reflect political conflict driven by institutional tension and competing power centers within Texas government.

These interpretations have not disappeared after the conclusion of formal proceedings. They continue to influence how the impeachment is discussed, remembered, and applied in current political discourse.

This series does not resolve those interpretations. It reconstructs the record on which they are based.

Why This Matters Now

The impeachment of Ken Paxton has become more than a historical event. It remains part of active political debate in Texas and is referenced in ongoing discussions about ethics, leadership, and accountability.

In the current political environment, perceptions of the impeachment—and the conduct underlying it—have become a visible and recurring element in public messaging and electoral politics.

As a result, the events examined in this series are not only historically significant. They are politically present. Understanding them requires understanding the record behind them.

The Approach

This series is built from primary sources and contemporaneous documentation. The objective is reconstruction, not conclusion.

Where the record is clear, it is presented clearly. Where it is contested, competing accounts are presented side by side.

The audience is not asked to accept a narrative—only to engage with the evidence.

Watch

Contact Us

Drop us a line!